Using a Sound Institutional Framework to Prevent and Mitigate Risks

Основное содержимое статьи

Zhong Kaibin

Аннотация

One of the guiding principles for China’s drive to further comprehensively deepen reform is to prioritise institutional reforms. The world today is undergoing profound changes unseen in a century, resulting in prevalent instability and uncertainty globally. To effectively prevent and defuse various risks and challenges, we must fully rely on institutions and use institutional certainty to counteract the uncertainty of risks. Socialism with Chinese characteristics has extraordinary capabilities of organisation, coordination and implementation. This institutional strength is the fundamental guarantee underpinning the ability to resist risks and challenges, enhance governance effectiveness, and maintain national security and social stability. To leverage institutions more effectively for risk prevention and mitigation, it is essential to build a sound institutional framework, enhance institutional enforcement capacity, and cultivate widespread institutional awareness in society, thereby providing a more comprehensive, stable, and practical institutional framework by making various systems more mature, well-defined and effective, and ultimately transforming the institutional strengths into risk prevention and control effectiveness.


Keywords: Institution Building, Risk Governance, Institutional Strengths, National Security.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Информация о статье

Как цитировать
Kaibin, Z. (2025). Using a Sound Institutional Framework to Prevent and Mitigate Risks. Международный журнал реформы и практики государственной службы, 13(3), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.56289/ijcsrp.208
Раздел
Статьи
Биография автора

Zhong Kaibin, China National Academy of Governance

Party School of the CPC Central Committee, China National Academy of Governance, a high-level think tank

Библиографические ссылки

Hu, A., Wang, S., and Zhou, J. (Eds.). (2009). China’s Second-Generation Reform Ideas: The System Construction as the Center (Expanded Edition). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.

Taskan, B., Junça-Silva, A., and Caetano, A. (2022). Clarifying the Conceptual Map of VUCA: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(7), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-02-2022-3136

The State Council Information Office. (2020). Fighting COVID-19: China in Action. http://english.scio.gov.cn/m/whitepapers/2020-06/07/content_76135269_3.htm

Wang, P., and Tang, B. (2019). An Analysis of the Party-Government Structure and Functional Mechanism of Contemporary China. Social Sciences in China, (9), 4-24, 204.

Xiao, G., and Che, Z. (2021). An Analysis of the Fundamental System, Basic System and Important System of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics. CASS Journal of Political Science, (6), 31-39, 174-175.

Xinhua News Agency. (2025). Inner-Party Statistical Communique of the Communist Party of China. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/20250630/38aa51caa78f4c8fb36236796a7a7a6a/c.html

Zhong, K. (2019). Improving the Capacity of Risk Governance: A Process Framework. Chinese Public Administration, (12), 127-132.