Recruiting Public Personnel: A Comparative Approach
Main Article Content
Abstract
Recruitment in the public sector is a multifaceted process influenced by various criteria, including merit, political considerations, patronage, and ascriptive factors. In different countries, governments use different approaches to recruiting public personnel. This article examines the way in which governments select administrators, and thereby one of the ways in which they narrow the range of possible outcomes of the policy-making process. Through this, we will see what those recruitment methods are, what characterises them and how they differ from each other. By addressing the challenges, we will explore the complexities of public sector recruitment, highlighting the need for a balanced approach that values merit while also promoting inclusivity and representation.
Keywords: Recruitment, Meritocracy, Competence, Political Patronage, Political Appointments, Representation.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Permissions
It is the responsibility of the author(s) to obtain any permission related to the use of the copyrighted texts as well as the reproduction of photographs and other illustrative materials to be used in their manuscript.
References
Aberbach, J., Putnam, R., and Rockman, B. (1981). Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020047
Beaumont, P. B. (1981). Government as Employer – Setting an Example? London: Royal Institute of Public Administration.
Clifford, C., Wright, V. (1997). The Politicization of the British Civil Service: Ambitions, Limits and Conceptual Problems. Unpublished paper, Nuffield College, Oxford.
Dolan, J., Rosenbloom, H. D. (2015). Representative Bureaucracy, Routledge, New York.
Grindle, M. S. (2011). Jobs for the Boys: Patronage and the State in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674065185
Heclo, H. (1975). OMB and the Presidency: The Problem of ‘Neutral Competence, The Public Intereset, 38, 80-98.
Karl, B. (1979). Executive Reform and Reorganization in the New Deal. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kaufman, H. (1956). Emerging conflicts in the doctrines of public administration. American Political Science Review, 50(4), 1057–1073, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1951335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1951335
Kearney, R. C. (1988). Political responsiveness and neutral competence in the developing countries. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 8(2), 66–80, https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X8800800206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X8800800206
Levin, B. (1983). A Forest of Red Needles: On the Politicization of Departments and Agencies, Stockholm: SNS Förlag, 91–100.
Page, E. C. (1992). Bureaucratic Authority and Political Power: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd ed., New York: Harvester.
Peters, B.G. (2018). The Politics of Bureaucracy: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. New York: Routledge. //efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://eclass.ekdd.gr/esdda/modules/document/file.php/KST-KF127/%CE%95%CE%BD%CF%8C%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%84%CE%B5%CF%82%201-2/Peters_The%20politics%20of%20bureaucracy_Comparative%20Public%20Administration_ch.%203.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813653
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. (2000). Citizens Versus the New Public Manager: The Problem of Mutual Empowerment, Administration and Society, 22, 9–28, https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019335
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. (2004). Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective, London: Routledge. //efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/55567/1/B.%20Guy%20Peters.pdf
Pierre, J. (1995). Bureaucracy in the Modern State: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration , Aldershot: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035352593
Rourke, F. E. (1992). Responsiveness and neutral competence in American bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 52(6), 539–546, https://doi.org/10.2307/977164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/977164
Savoie, D. J. (1999). Governing from the Centre, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442675445
Sowa, J. E., Selden, S. C. (2003). Administrative Discretion and Active Representation: An Expansion of the Theory of Representative Bureaucracy, Public Administration Review, 63, 700–10,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00333
Weimer, D. (2005) Institutionalizing neutrally competent policy analysis: resources for promoting objectivity and balance in consolidating democracies. Policy Studies Journal, 33(2),131–146, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00098.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00098.x
World Bank. (2000). World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking poverty. Oxford University Press.https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/673161468161371338
West, W. (2005). Neutral competence and political responsiveness: an uneasy relationship. Policy Study, 33(2),147–160,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00099.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00099.x